From 502b148c7ae8e003c02e7f73fad2109cb8dc6a52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alekos Filini Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:56:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Issue a correction in the miniscript bug blogpost --- docs/_blog/miniscript_vulnerability.md | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/_blog/miniscript_vulnerability.md b/docs/_blog/miniscript_vulnerability.md index 16d79026fd..bdb8730ae4 100644 --- a/docs/_blog/miniscript_vulnerability.md +++ b/docs/_blog/miniscript_vulnerability.md @@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ The tool we used has been [published on GitHub][tool-link] and can be run by any We would like to thank [`sanket1729`][sanket1729] and [`RCasatta`][RCasatta] for their help implementing and running the tool on the bitcoin mainnet blockchain. +## Correction (2022-04-25) + +By re-running the tool on the mainnet blockchain for a second time we were able to find one vulnerable output, created and spent a long time ago (around the initial announcement and release date of Miniscript). + +The amount was negligible, so we believe this was a small test performed by somebody to play with Miniscript. + + [spending-policy-demo]: /blog/2021/02/spending-policy-demo [security-advisory]: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript/blob/70191e5a32f7c072d32476ba0b8861ca57af3df8/doc/security_report_2022_04_20.md [blocks-iterator]: https://github.com/RCasatta/blocks_iterator -- 2.49.0